On campus, an absurd overregulation of sexual conduct

In the early 1990s, in the midst of a national debate about feminism, sexual relationships, and sexual violence, the media discovered an unusual sexual conduct policy at Antioch College, a small liberal arts school in Ohio. The policy, adopted in response to complaints from a group called Womyn of Antioch about not enough being done to stop date rape on campus, mandated explicit verbal consent every step of the way in a sexual encounter -- from undoing a button to sexual intercourse. At the time, it elicited a lot of mockery. But while the debate has gone away, the mindset that inspired the Antioch policy has not.

Over the years, a number of colleges and universities have adopted less extreme versions of this policy, requiring explicit verbal consent to sex though not quite in so much detail. But now, Gettysburg College in Pennsylvania seems to have outdone Antioch: Under that school's policy, a verbally unsanctioned hug could be treated as a sexual assault.

Gettysburg's policy, publicized by the Philadelphia-based Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, defines sexual misconduct as ''a threat of a sexual nature or deliberate physical contact of a sexual nature without the other person's consent," and goes on to state that the physical contact covered by the policy includes nonconsensual ''brushing, touching, grabbing, pinching, patting, hugging, and kissing," as well as ''coerced sexual activities, including rape."

''Each individual," the policy goes on to state, ''has a responsibility to obtain consent before engaging in sexual interaction. Consent is defined as the act of willingly and verbally agreeing (for example, by stating 'yes') to engage in specific sexual conduct. If either person at any point in a sexual encounter does not give continuing and active consent, all sexual contact must cease, even if consent was given earlier."

One hopes this does not mean that both people in a sexual encounter must constantly reaffirm their willingness to continue what they're doing. But who knows? The foundation points out that because it is impossible to enforce such a policy consistently, it will inevitably be enforced in arbitrary ways. If everyone violates the rules at one time or another, anyone is a potential target for punishment.

Policies such as Gettysburg's and Antioch's stem from a noble concern with sexual violence. There has been much debate about the statistics on campus sexual assault. Some researchers claim that as many as one in four college women will be a victim of attempted or completed rape by graduation; critics charge that these figures are vastly overstated and include many instances of miscommunication, not assault. Still, whatever the scope of the problem, it is real and troubling.

Feminists have argued that the traditional romantic script of male aggression and female coyness often contributes to date rape: A man may think that he is sweeping the woman off her feet when he is actually overpowering her with force. There is some substance to this critique: It is difficult not to cringe while reading or watching some aggressive seduction/borderline rape scenes in old books and movies. ''No means no" is generally a good principle, even if sometimes it may be taken too far. (Some antirape activists argue that once the woman has said no, any attempt by the man to change her mind should be regarded as coercion.)

But the requirement of ensuring an explicit ''yes" takes the campaign against sexual assault to a new and absurd level. For one thing, it infantilizes women (while the policies may be gender-neutral on their face, they generally presume men to be the initiators in heterosexual encounters). Are women so weak that they can't even say ''no," or otherwise indicate their lack of consent, unless the man takes the initiative of asking?

Such policies also absurdly overregulate sexual relations -- particularly since they often require verbal consent to each act even in an ongoing relationship. Forget spontaneity, passion, the thrill of discovery. Forget letting go. At the time of the Antioch policy debate, one sexual assault counselor primly condemned ''the blind give-and-take of sexual negotiations," arguing that it should be replaced by clear communication. The worthy goal of rape prevention has been twisted into a utopian attempt to remake human sexuality -- in an image that is not particularly attractive.

The little-known 1987 movie ''Cherry 2000" portrayed a futuristic society in which every date was preceded by a sit-down with lawyers and a written contract about the specific activities to which both parties agreed -- and in which a lot of men sought the company of female androids programmed not only for sex but for old-fashioned romance. Is that where the Gettysburg policy is taking us?

Source






CALIFORNIA CHARTER SCHOOL TOO SUCCESSFUL

It was apparently seen as bad that there were no failing students. Having a good learning environment for more able students could not be tolerated

When the Sequoia Union High School District board approved Summit Preparatory High School's charter petition Wednesday night, rows of signs popped out of the cheering audience that simply read: "Thank you" and "Gracias." It was the Summit community's creative way of showing its appreciation to the trustees for unanimously agreeing to sponsor the Redwood City charter school for two years.

This vote came despite concerns among trustees and district staff that the school is lacking in the diversity it claims to strive for in its petition. Summit's mission is to prepare a diverse student population for college. And yet, Sequoia Superintendent Pat Gemma presented a response to the school's petition, stating the school is lacking in its number of low-performing students as well as students in special education and English-learner programs. For example, data from the 2005 state standards test show that no sophomore or junior is classified as "far below basic" in the English language arts category. Nonetheless, he recommended the board approve the school's charter, with the condition that the school strive toward enrolling more struggling students.

The trustees agreed with this recommendation. "Teaching kids that are high-performing is great," trustee Don Gibson said. "Teaching kids that are lower-performing so they can get into college is what charter schools are about."

Summit's charter through the Summerville Union High School District in Tuolumne County expires this year. The school, which opened in 2003, submitted a charter petition to Sequoia in April, because state law now requires charter high schools to be sponsored by their local high school districts. Next fall, Summit will outgrow its current campus in an office building as it adds a senior class, bringing its enrollment to 375. Since Sequoia is required by law to provide facilities for charter schools within its boundaries, Summit will move into portable classrooms on property next to the district office and Sequoia High School.

Though trustee Olivia Martinez said she was very supportive of what the school offers students, she too developed concerns after she spoke to five students learning English who left the school. "The consensus was they didn't feel comfortable there," she said. "The expectations were too high." In the future, she said, she would like Summit to work on helping students be more at ease with the school's curriculum. "The (charter school) bill was designed to provide alternatives that would help all students," she said.

Sergio Fernandez, in his third year at Summit, said the school's teachers helped him overcome his struggles in math with tutoring and encouragement. "When I first went to Summit, I didn't believe in myself," Fernandez, 17, said. "They (the teachers) believed in me, and they're 100 percent sure I can go to college."

Source. Joanne Jacobs has some comments on the above.






Gutless school needs police to discipline a 6-year old!

A 6-year-old special education student who kicked a Naples teacher's aide and spent several hous in juvenile jail is facing felony battery charges. Her mother, however, wants to know why the case has gone so far. Takovia Allen suffers from behavioral problems and attends a special class at Lely Elementary in Naples.

According to an arrest report, on May 2, a teacher was trying to line up students to go to music class. Takovia refused to go and kicked the teacher's aide in the ankle. After a discussion among school officials and two law enforcement officials called to the school, the girl was arrested. Takovia was taken to juvenile jail and held there for several hours before being released to her mother.

She is being charged with battery on a public education employee. It's possible she will enter a program that includes counseling. If she completes the program successfully the charges could be dropped.

Source

***************************

For greatest efficiency, lowest cost and maximum choice, ALL schools should be privately owned and run -- with government-paid vouchers for the poor and minimal regulation.

The NEA and similar unions worldwide believe that children should be thoroughly indoctrinated with Green/Left, feminist/homosexual ideology but the "3 R's" are something that kids should just be allowed to "discover"

Comments? Email me here. For times when blogger.com is playing up, there is a mirror of this site (viewable even in China!) here. My home page is here

***************************