Monday, December 17, 2007

Student Suspended for Warning of Sex Offenders in School

(Gig Harbor, Washington) Last week, a student at Gig Harbor High School, Raydon Gilmore, was suspended for posting warning fliers about two convicted juvenile sex offenders who attend his school. Holy moly!

Three other students, names are withheld, were also suspended for the same infraction. The sex offender students are listed as a Level 1 and a Level 2, respectively considered to be low-risk and moderate-risk of re-offending.

According to Gig Harbor Principal Greg Schellenberg, Gilmore and three other students were suspended for three days for harassment and misuse of school equipment.
The students, he said, used a school printer to produce "dozens" of fliers with the sex offenders' pictures, home addresses and other personal information.

Schellenberg said the students taped the fliers on vending machines and a pingpong table and dropped them outside bathrooms. The school's security cameras caught some of them in the act.

The principal said the students should have brought their concerns to a teacher or an administrator. They also violated a rule that state officials must approve any materials that students post on campus walls.
Apparently, legislative guidance on notifications regarding sex offenders in school is minimal. The sheriff notifies the principal and the principal notifies the sex offender's teachers. That's it. Neither students nor parents are notified. In fact, all cognizant parties are cautioned to be low key regarding the sex offender's presence among other students.

Principal Schellenberg says that the school administrators "at least periodically, try to point parents where to find information."
If students want to talk about a sex offender who attends school, that's fine, he said. Distributing offenders' information and opening their convictions to a "public forum" at school isn't.

"We want everybody to feel safe and comfortable," Schellenberg said. "It's hard to imagine anyone feeling that way with fliers being posted about them."
Therefore, the school makes "everyone" feel safe and comfortable by not disclosing when a sex offender is present. Simply put, they are kept in the dark. Like it or not, that's the system. Unfortunately.

All responsibility resides with the principal to make sure adequate measures are implemented to confidentially monitor the sex offender students and hopefully preclude any future criminal behavior. As a reminder, the sex offender information is available but one has to specifically be looking for it.

All in all, the issue remains contentious as Gilmore and his mother, Meloney Garthe, continue to complain about the suspensions. Gilmore maintains that he was concerned about vulnerable girls in the student body and he would do the same thing again. His mother says that she is proud of her son for doing a public service.

My take? Convicted sex offenders should not be allowed near public high schools, much less inside.

3 comments:

Karl said...

My take? Convicted sex offenders should not be allowed near public high schools, much less inside.
Problem is, those particular sex offenders were students enrolled at that school. Until such time as the laws change and the State is no longer required to provide a free, public education to all minors, those two will have to be able to go to school somewhere.

What's the alternative? State-sponsored home schooling?

Anonymous said...

Holy Moley! It is called harassment! It is against the law, and says so on the website.

Anonymous said...

Josh, obviously, sex offenses are against the law, too. Harassment should be the least of worries. Some of these kids have committed heinous crimes. The needs & safety of innocent, law obiding students need to be placed ahead of the offenders.

I do agree with Karl's comments, though.

As a parent, I want my children to be safe at all times. Schools should be sex offender free-we run background checks on staff but then overlook potentially dangerous students??

To think these sex offenders are lurking in our classrooms, playing sports & sitting next to our kids in class & we don't even know. It's rediculous. Are they my kids friends or neighbors we let come over to hang out?

It is our responsibility to educate our children of the dangers out there. I understand that they (offenders) are minors & have rights but so do we as parents. It is not necessary to give us the names but at least give us a warning that they are in the schools with our children so we can better protect our kids & staff with the knowledge. It at least opens a door for those parents who may not other wise talk to their kids about these danger or simply just don't know.

The Sheriff's Department sends out notifications when an adult offender moves in why not have them notify the school & the school notify the parents but keep the individual's identity anonymous?