All things being equal, I would desire decisions about
teaching policy at individual schools to be made at the lowest possible level,
with the greatest possible deference given to the parents unless some truly indispensable
knowledge is at stake. The history of court decisions in this country, most
notably in the 9th Circuit, tells a far different story. Parents are
increasingly feeling left out of decisions that affect their ability to
educate, discipline, or even raise their children without some form of
government interference. The spirit of this problem is reflected in the
statement of one of the comments of one critic of the proposed laws:
“Is it not categorically absurd to think that if we
don’t teach our children about it, they will operate effectively from a
paradigm of ignorance and make good decisions?”
It would indeed be absurd were that what was actually
being proposed. It is not. The statement assumes that only the public school
system is willing and qualified to provide children and adolescents with a
reasonable level of knowledge pertaining to sex. The history of public schools,
particularly in recent decades, hardly shows them to be the last bastion of
capable instruction. Indeed, parents teaching students at home have begun to
show that parents are quite capable of instructing students better than
teaching professionals when available. This is not to denigrate the work of
teachers. This simply recognizes that public school settings can seldom match
the attention and motivation that parents are able to give their own children.
To insist that they are incapable of educating their children with regards to
some of the most important decisions they will make in life is arrogant and
presumptuous, and does nothing to promote the kind of partnership between
parents and teachers that would truly benefit everyone.
No comments:
Post a Comment